<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grossman and Gaza</title>
	<atom:link href="http://middleeastpolitics.net/2008/12/31/grossman-and-gaza/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://middleeastpolitics.net/2008/12/31/grossman-and-gaza/</link>
	<description>Facts, News, Trends, Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William deB. Mills</title>
		<link>http://middleeastpolitics.net/2008/12/31/grossman-and-gaza/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>William deB. Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middleeastpolitics.net/?p=4023#comment-532</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea, but care will need to be taken to define &quot;immediate crisis&quot; in fair, balanced terms. One of those terms surely must be the end of shooting weapons at each other; another term must surely be the end of collective punishment (which includes, actually, both Hamas rockets fired into civilian areas and Israeli economic/medicine/energy boycotts and denial of basic human rights to the people of Gaza). Have I said anything yet that reasonable supporters of either side could disagree with? It really is hard to make any statement on which all participants can agree in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It would be nice to hear that I have just done this. If so, then, maybe we can move forward. Someone please tell me if the above formulation is sufficiently neutral and balanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea, but care will need to be taken to define &#8220;immediate crisis&#8221; in fair, balanced terms. One of those terms surely must be the end of shooting weapons at each other; another term must surely be the end of collective punishment (which includes, actually, both Hamas rockets fired into civilian areas and Israeli economic/medicine/energy boycotts and denial of basic human rights to the people of Gaza). Have I said anything yet that reasonable supporters of either side could disagree with? It really is hard to make any statement on which all participants can agree in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It would be nice to hear that I have just done this. If so, then, maybe we can move forward. Someone please tell me if the above formulation is sufficiently neutral and balanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

